Added: Apr 26, 2008
From: brainouty
Duration: 10:37
Original wmv download link (very readable):http://blip.tv/file/get/Brainout-Isaiah53MeterKeyIsaiah53Series862.wmv Isaiah crafts the meter of Chapter 53 (52:13-53:12 in Hebrew) based on God's 490-year Time Grants.I just stumbled onto Isaiah's Meter Key by mistake (yeah right, no mistake by God!) on 4/24/08.Given the Promise of Messiah since Genesis 3:15, the Genesis 5 & 11 rosters show how God's 490-year Time Grants were fulfilled to culminate in Abraham, & from there to Christ. Given the foundational need for Time to occur on time, so He can be born on time, God communicates the Time doctrine by using Time itself (i.e., dates) in Bible. Hence, the calendar: Moses was given Passover Holiday & Pentecost to remind Israel of her future history. These two holidays forecast that 57 years prior to the termination of a civilization period, Messiah would have come. That period had a hedge of an added seven years (to 'repay' Passion Week which Passover depicted), but its actual year wasn't known until David died in 963BC at age 77. So the end of time was 963+1000, 37AD. Isaiah plays on this fact.Scholars are unaware of all this. Mistaken readings of Daniel 9:25 and 9:26, 1Kings 6:1 (which tells you David had been dead for 3 years), plus the normal eyes-glazed-over reaction to Bible's dates & begats, resulted in us not knowing God's Orchestration of Time. I wouldn't have known it either, but for my pastor's lifelong teaching that believers are used by God to BUY time: I didn't know what he meant. So when auditing that claim, God used circumstances in my head & outside by others, to make me 'get' this very prolific doctrine. It's very provable in Bible, but it takes time (heh) to vet all the many verses.Another way the doctrine is expressed in Bible: via the poetic meter of the prophets. Isaiah is one of them; he crafts Isaiah 53 to BALANCE to the 490-year promise unit of time.Related webpages are:A jpg file shows the tentative reparsing of the chapter which isn't clear in the video: http://www.geocities.com/brainout1/Isaiah53.JPG . The other Meter Hypotheses videos in my brainout-made playlist on profile page, have better jpgs for your use. Or, just go to http://www.geocities.com/brainout1/Isa53trans.htm to see them all in order.Associated Word doc (2 pages) is http://www.geocities.com/brainout1/Isa521315Weaving.doc .http://www.geocities.com/brainout1/Mirroring.htm is the main page on God's Time rules. The Excel spreadsheet linked within Mirroring.htm is used for this video: http://www.geocities.com/brainout1/GeneYrs.xls .
Channel: Howto
Tags: 490 53 bible brainout daniel exegesis grant isaiah rapture time tribulation year
Rating: 5.00 (1 ratings) Views: 153 Comments: 5
brainouty Says:
Jun 21, 2008 - You look again: Matthew is proving that Jesus is the promised Messiah via the lineage, deftly noting the crossover due to Jeconiah's curse at Shealtiel. Luke 3 does that for Mary, her genealogy, and the same crossover is there (yeah, because she's descended through Nathan). 77th Son, in Luke 3; 14's used to play on Isaiah. 14's used to play also, in Matthew 1:17.
BaldFury1 Says:
Jun 22, 2008 - Jesus is NOT from the genealogy of Joseph. Nor does Luke 3 Show the genealogy of Mary.JESUS IS FROM GOD and MARY( A Virgin )
brainouty Says:
Jun 22, 2008 - I didn't say Jesus was from Joseph: please re-read my last comment. Jeconiah's curse meant that Shealtiel was ADOPTED by Jeconiah, who spent his fertile years in Babylonian Jail. I cover that in more detail in a webpage going through all this, PassPlot(dot)htm. Virgin Pregnancy was essential to prevent transmission of the old sin nature in Adam (Greek of Romans 5:12, 1Cor15:22). :)
prvillanueva Says:
Jul 7, 2008 - This is excellent research. I have been reading the Book of Jubilees trying to figure out God's ordained time and calendar. Jubilees starts with the creation of Adam as 1 A.M. I agree, that correct time-keeping has been lost by the Jews and the Christians probably never had or understood it. Thanks for your work.
brainouty Says:
Jul 7, 2008 - Oh: prvillanueva, I extensively documented from Bible the entire construct in my webpages, and in the "How God Orchestrates Time" video description you'll find the links. It will take months to plow through all that material, but it will still save you time in whatever research you're doing, if you want to compare with Bible.
brainouty Says:
Jul 7, 2008 - Bible's account differs from Book of Jubilee, by the way.
prvillanueva Says:
Jul 8, 2008 - I'll look further into the great research you have done. Let me clarify my "1 A.M." statement. My translation of Jubilees 3:15 reads, "And in the first week of the first jubilee [1-7 A.M.] Adam and his wife were in the garden of Eden for seven years . . ." So, I assumed that time in Anno Mundi began with the creation of man. ANy direction, guidance, suggestions, or comments are much appreciated. We really like your research.
brainouty Says:
Jul 8, 2008 - 1st difference is that God begins to "number the days" after Adam's fall; from that comes the "year of the world" in my GeneYrs.xls (spreadsheet affords quickest way to grasp the construct). Mirroring.htm & PassPlot.htm provide Bible citation dating backup in excruciating detail.Bible's silent on when Earth was created. Disjunctive waw + "tohu wa bohu" in Gen1:2 CHANGE post-initial creation: search on tohu wa bohu, pan-Bible. So Gen 1 covers restoration, not initial creation. Hope this helps.
prvillanueva Says:
Jul 9, 2008 - thnx! I have been "breathing 1Jn.1:9" while examining your webpages. Really enjoying the new (to me) teaching and exploration. I would much rather depend on the "Bible" than on Jubilees for dating, and your work has made that possible. It's weird, suddenly (prior to discovering you), I got this hankering to know God's correct time-keeping. I'll keep reading. Again, THNX!!
BaldFury1 Says:
Jun 21, 2008 - Look Again...Matthew 1:1-16 Has nothing to do with the Generations Of Jesus.....Joseph was not the father of Jesus...God is...Someone thru history has removed the line of 'MARY' HMMMMM??( It does'nt seem like you are trying to understand Isaiah 53...It seems more like you are trying to make it fit an alternative.)